Daily Regulatory Signal
2026-09-29
Verra Secures IC-VCM Approval for Carbon Capture and Storage Methodology
Argentina's Carbon Market Bill Stalls Over Jurisdictional REDD+ Debate
Open Letter Urges Article 6.4 Body to Embed Rights-Based Safeguards in SD Tool Review
UN Report: Stacking Carbon and Biodiversity Credits Could Bolster Forest Restoration Finance
Japanese Shipper Takes 30% Stake in Norwegian Offshore CCS Project
NZ Government Acknowledges ETS Alone Cannot Deliver Post-2030 Emissions Cuts
RGGI Allowances Rebound From Dip Below $38 as Trading Volumes Double
Biodiversity Development Finance Tripled Over Decade but Outlook Uncertain, Says OECD
Mining Duo Launch Blast Furnace CCS Trial Facility in China
Banks and Funds Increase Share of Low-Carbon Energy Finance Year-on-Year
## OzelCarbonOS VCM Intelligence Brief — 29 September 2026
The most consequential development for the voluntary carbon market this cycle is **Verra's announcement that the IC-VCM has approved its Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) methodology** ([Verra](https://verra.org/verra-secures-icvcm-approval-for-carbon-capture-and-storage-methodology/)). This is a significant milestone for engineered-removal credits under the VCS programme: IC-VCM endorsement effectively opens the door for CCS-derived credits to carry Core Carbon Principle (CCP) labels, potentially commanding a premium over conventional avoidance credits. Buyers seeking high-integrity removal tonnes — particularly those aligning procurement with SBTi guidance — now have a clearer pathway through Verra's registry. The approval also reinforces the broader market trend of IC-VCM acting as the de facto quality gate, widening the spread between CCP-labelled and unlabelled credits.
On the **policy and standards front**, two stories dominate. First, **Argentina's flagship carbon market bill has stalled in the senate** over disagreements on jurisdictional REDD+ (J-REDD+) provisions ([Carbon Pulse](https://carbon-pulse.com/555191/)). The impasse highlights the persistent tension between national sovereignty over forest carbon and sub-national (provincial) claims — a dynamic that echoes similar debates in Brazil and Indonesia and has direct implications for REDD+ supply pipelines in Latin America. Second, **over 100 organisations have sent an open letter to the Article 6.4 Supervisory Body** urging rights-based amendments to the Sustainable Development tool under review ([Carbon Pulse](https://carbon-pulse.com/555201/)). The letter specifically calls for recognition of both legal and customary land rights, and removal of a clause signatories argue undermines community consent and, by extension, market confidence. If the SBM incorporates these changes, it could raise the bar for Article 6.4 credit issuance — tightening future supply but improving perceived integrity.
A **UN report published this week argues that stacking carbon and biodiversity credits could substantially bolster forest restoration finance**, though it cautions that immature nature-credit markets and weak verification systems remain barriers ([Carbon Pulse](https://carbon-pulse.com/555177/)). This dovetails with OECD data showing that biodiversity-related development finance has more than tripled over the past decade, yet the outlook is clouded by anticipated falls in official development assistance ([Carbon Pulse](https://carbon-pulse.com/555250/)). For VCM participants, the stacking thesis is increasingly relevant: ARR and REDD+ project developers exploring biodiversity co-benefits could unlock additional revenue streams, but only if registries and standards bodies formalise robust claim-stacking protocols.
In **compliance-adjacent markets**, New Zealand's government has publicly acknowledged that its ETS alone will not deliver post-2030 reduction targets, signalling forthcoming complementary policy measures ([Carbon Pulse](https://carbon-pulse.com/555278/)). Meanwhile, RGGI allowances rebounded after briefly dipping below $38, with secondary-market volumes roughly doubling — suggesting renewed speculative or compliance-driven activity ([Carbon Pulse](https://carbon-pulse.com/555155/)). On the **corporate investment side**, a major Japanese shipping company is acquiring a 30 % stake in a Norwegian offshore CCS venture ([Carbon Pulse](https://carbon-pulse.com/555311/)), and a blast-furnace CCS trial capable of capturing 10,000 tCO₂/yr has been commissioned in China ([Carbon Pulse](https://carbon-pulse.com/555197/)). These deals underscore the accelerating corporate appetite for CCS-linked decarbonisation — a trend that, combined with the new IC-VCM-approved Verra CCS methodology, could reshape the removals credit landscape over the coming quarters.
Finally, Verra has opened a fresh batch of projects for public comment as of 28 September ([Verra](https://verra.org/projects-open-for-public-comment-september-28-2026/)), and a new report finds that bank and fund allocation to low-carbon energy rose year-on-year in 2025, though levels still lag net-zero-aligned benchmarks ([Carbon Pulse](https://carbon-pulse.com/555228/)). Market participants should monitor the Argentina J-REDD+ legislative outcome and Article 6.4 SD-tool revisions closely — both carry material implications for REDD+ credit supply and pricing in H1 2027.
https://verra.org/verra-secures-icvcm-approval-for-carbon-capture-and-storage-methodology/
https://carbon-pulse.com/555191/
https://carbon-pulse.com/555201/
https://carbon-pulse.com/555177/
https://carbon-pulse.com/555311/
https://carbon-pulse.com/555278/
https://carbon-pulse.com/555155/
https://carbon-pulse.com/555250/
https://carbon-pulse.com/555197/
https://carbon-pulse.com/555228/
https://verra.org/projects-open-for-public-comment-september-28-2026/
https://carbon-pulse.com/555288/